<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 195 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780727</link>
    <description>CESTAT ND - AT held that contributions paid by member hotels to the scheme administrator to reimburse redemptions are not consideration for a taxable service, as the administrator merely administers the loyalty scheme and does not render publicity/marketing or recommend specific hotels. Pre-2005 cross-border service tax demands were correctly dropped on facts. Demands based on selecting the higher of two values were set aside as presumptive and unsupported. Payments to an artist were not manpower-supply services. Extended limitation could be invoked only for wilful suppression with intent to evade. Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 15:57:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 195 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780727</link>
      <description>CESTAT ND - AT held that contributions paid by member hotels to the scheme administrator to reimburse redemptions are not consideration for a taxable service, as the administrator merely administers the loyalty scheme and does not render publicity/marketing or recommend specific hotels. Pre-2005 cross-border service tax demands were correctly dropped on facts. Demands based on selecting the higher of two values were set aside as presumptive and unsupported. Payments to an artist were not manpower-supply services. Extended limitation could be invoked only for wilful suppression with intent to evade. Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>