https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780733 HC dismissed petitions challenging provisional attachment orders under s.5 PMLA, holding they are not maintainable under Article 226 because Section 26 provides an alternative, efficacious remedy. The court reasoned that where the statute supplies a self-contained appellate mechanism-appeal from the Adjudicating Authority to the Appellate Tribunal-all questions on validity, scope and effect of attachment orders must be resolved within the PMLA framework. Petitions were not entertained and were disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Nov 2025 08:35:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780733 HC dismissed petitions challenging provisional attachment orders under s.5 PMLA, holding they are not maintainable under Article 226 because Section 26 provides an alternative, efficacious remedy. The court reasoned that where the statute supplies a self-contained appellate mechanism-appeal from the Adjudicating Authority to the Appellate Tribunal-all questions on validity, scope and effect of attachment orders must be resolved within the PMLA framework. Petitions were not entertained and were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780733