https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780736 The Board found that the noticee publicly claimed to be the "best" SEBI-registered research analyst, a misleading representation lacking documentary support, and failed to intimate SEBI about a change in its principal place of business, breaching regulation 24(2) read with Schedule III (Clauses 1,2,7,8) of the RA Regulations. The record-keeping allegation regarding duly signed and dated research reports was not established. Considering corrective removal of the website statement, the Board imposed a regulatory censure under Section 19 of the SEBI Act and Regulation 27(5) of the Intermediaries Regulations. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Nov 2025 08:35:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780736 The Board found that the noticee publicly claimed to be the "best" SEBI-registered research analyst, a misleading representation lacking documentary support, and failed to intimate SEBI about a change in its principal place of business, breaching regulation 24(2) read with Schedule III (Clauses 1,2,7,8) of the RA Regulations. The record-keeping allegation regarding duly signed and dated research reports was not established. Considering corrective removal of the website statement, the Board imposed a regulatory censure under Section 19 of the SEBI Act and Regulation 27(5) of the Intermediaries Regulations. Case-Laws SEBI Wed, 02 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780736