https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780738 NCLAT PB refused condonation of a 147-day delay in refiling an appeal under Rule 26, holding the appellant failed to show sufficient justification beyond their control. The bench noted the larger NCLAT decision permitting refiling delays where justified, but found no prevailing circumstances here: registry defects remained uncured despite multiple intimations and the appellant's inaction and lack of due diligence prolonged curable defects. On that basis the application for condonation of delay was not allowed and stands rejected. en-us Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Nov 2025 11:22:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780738 NCLAT PB refused condonation of a 147-day delay in refiling an appeal under Rule 26, holding the appellant failed to show sufficient justification beyond their control. The bench noted the larger NCLAT decision permitting refiling delays where justified, but found no prevailing circumstances here: registry defects remained uncured despite multiple intimations and the appellant's inaction and lack of due diligence prolonged curable defects. On that basis the application for condonation of delay was not allowed and stands rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780738