<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 215 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780747</link>
    <description>ITAT KOLATA - AT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s quashing of a reopening under s.148 where the revenue issued notice after being notified of an amalgamation and the non-existence of the merged entity. The AO proceeded with assessment against the defunct transferee despite the assessee&#039;s responses; the CIT(A) relied on established HC/SC principles on amalgamation. No factual error was shown by revenue to overturn the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, so the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed and the reopening/assessment set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 08:35:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 215 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780747</link>
      <description>ITAT KOLATA - AT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s quashing of a reopening under s.148 where the revenue issued notice after being notified of an amalgamation and the non-existence of the merged entity. The AO proceeded with assessment against the defunct transferee despite the assessee&#039;s responses; the CIT(A) relied on established HC/SC principles on amalgamation. No factual error was shown by revenue to overturn the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, so the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed and the reopening/assessment set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>