<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 229 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780761</link>
    <description>HC held the ex parte reassessment proceedings were caused by non-communication by the petitioner&#039;s chartered accountant and, relying on comparable precedent, granted the petitioner one opportunity to appear before the assessing authority and furnish replies to notices under Sections 148A and 148B (read with Sections 147, 144 and 144B). The court directed the assessing authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s submissions accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 15:58:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 229 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780761</link>
      <description>HC held the ex parte reassessment proceedings were caused by non-communication by the petitioner&#039;s chartered accountant and, relying on comparable precedent, granted the petitioner one opportunity to appear before the assessing authority and furnish replies to notices under Sections 148A and 148B (read with Sections 147, 144 and 144B). The court directed the assessing authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s submissions accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>