<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 233 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780765</link>
    <description>HC held that notices issued under s.153C were unsustainable and set aside. Applying the principle that the ten-year limitation runs from the date the jurisdictional AO of the non-searched person receives books, documents or assets seized from the searched person, the assessments for AYs 2010-11 to 2015-16 fell beyond the ten-year block as on the notice dates. The writ petitions were allowed and the impugned notices dated 31.08.2024 and 12.09.2024 were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 08:35:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 233 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780765</link>
      <description>HC held that notices issued under s.153C were unsustainable and set aside. Applying the principle that the ten-year limitation runs from the date the jurisdictional AO of the non-searched person receives books, documents or assets seized from the searched person, the assessments for AYs 2010-11 to 2015-16 fell beyond the ten-year block as on the notice dates. The writ petitions were allowed and the impugned notices dated 31.08.2024 and 12.09.2024 were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>