https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464536 An appellate order passed by the Commissioner under Section 24(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 remains amenable to revision under Section 210 because the finality attached to the appellate order only excludes a further appeal, not revisional jurisdiction. Applying harmonious construction, the Court read the finality clause and the revisional provision together and held that the Board's revisional power is preserved where no second appeal lies under the Code. On that basis, the writ petition was not entertained because a statutory revisional remedy was still available. en-us Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Nov 2025 16:09:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464536 An appellate order passed by the Commissioner under Section 24(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 remains amenable to revision under Section 210 because the finality attached to the appellate order only excludes a further appeal, not revisional jurisdiction. Applying harmonious construction, the Court read the finality clause and the revisional provision together and held that the Board's revisional power is preserved where no second appeal lies under the Code. On that basis, the writ petition was not entertained because a statutory revisional remedy was still available. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464536