https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464539 The SC dismissed the appeal, upholding the HC's refusal to condone lengthy, inexcusable delay and its exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227. The HC reasonably suggested restoring the dismissed petition if possession were handed over, but the appellants declined and failed to show due diligence; their attempt to ignore prescribed limitation was rejected. The court held limitation rules are substantive, not merely technical, and substantial justice cannot override prejudice to the respondent. The HC's impugned order was free of legal error and was affirmed. en-us Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Nov 2025 16:14:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464539 The SC dismissed the appeal, upholding the HC's refusal to condone lengthy, inexcusable delay and its exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227. The HC reasonably suggested restoring the dismissed petition if possession were handed over, but the appellants declined and failed to show due diligence; their attempt to ignore prescribed limitation was rejected. The court held limitation rules are substantive, not merely technical, and substantial justice cannot override prejudice to the respondent. The HC's impugned order was free of legal error and was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464539