https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464540 Conveyance of Block-A could not be compelled in the absence of an express contractual covenant or clear statutory obligation. Reading the relevant improvement enactments, the board resolution and the lease deed together, the analysis showed that the resolution provided a separate conveyance only for Block-B, while the lease for Block-A contained no term requiring transfer on expiry; Sections 48(a) and 51(2) were construed harmoniously in that context. The writ challenge was also treated as barred by delay and laches because the lease had expired long earlier, no timely civil proceeding was taken, and extraordinary writ relief may be declined where unexplained inordinate delay indicates acquiescence or an available alternate remedy. en-us Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Nov 2025 20:06:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464540 Conveyance of Block-A could not be compelled in the absence of an express contractual covenant or clear statutory obligation. Reading the relevant improvement enactments, the board resolution and the lease deed together, the analysis showed that the resolution provided a separate conveyance only for Block-B, while the lease for Block-A contained no term requiring transfer on expiry; Sections 48(a) and 51(2) were construed harmoniously in that context. The writ challenge was also treated as barred by delay and laches because the lease had expired long earlier, no timely civil proceeding was taken, and extraordinary writ relief may be declined where unexplained inordinate delay indicates acquiescence or an available alternate remedy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464540