<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1742 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464565</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata (AT) held that reopening assessment under s.147 was unjustified because the AO&#039;s reasons reflected only suspicion, not a reasonable belief that income had escaped assessment. Broker&#039;s post-trade client-code modifications were accepted as a regular business practice and no material linked those modifications to tax-escape. Lacking basis to form belief, the reassessment notice failed; the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 20:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1742 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464565</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata (AT) held that reopening assessment under s.147 was unjustified because the AO&#039;s reasons reflected only suspicion, not a reasonable belief that income had escaped assessment. Broker&#039;s post-trade client-code modifications were accepted as a regular business practice and no material linked those modifications to tax-escape. Lacking basis to form belief, the reassessment notice failed; the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>