<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1517 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464566</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI (AT) held that disallowance under s.14A/rule 8D is not permissible where no exempt income (dividend) is claimed and upheld CIT(A)&#039;s finding of adequate own funds. The tribunal affirmed deletion of notional income for lower guarantee commission, finding the charged 0.75% reasonable. Foreign-exchange forward contract losses were held business losses (not speculative) as contracts matched export orders. Payments of export agent commission and overseas warehousing charges to non-residents were held not taxable in India, so s.40(a)(i) addition was denied. Late employee EPF contributions were allowed where paid before filing the return; revenue grounds were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 20:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1517 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464566</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI (AT) held that disallowance under s.14A/rule 8D is not permissible where no exempt income (dividend) is claimed and upheld CIT(A)&#039;s finding of adequate own funds. The tribunal affirmed deletion of notional income for lower guarantee commission, finding the charged 0.75% reasonable. Foreign-exchange forward contract losses were held business losses (not speculative) as contracts matched export orders. Payments of export agent commission and overseas warehousing charges to non-residents were held not taxable in India, so s.40(a)(i) addition was denied. Late employee EPF contributions were allowed where paid before filing the return; revenue grounds were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>