<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 113 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47711</link>
    <description>The HC ruled that the Settlement Commission under Chapter XIV-A of the Customs Act has broad jurisdiction to entertain settlement applications, provided the conditions of filing a Bill of Entry or Shipping Bill and issuance of a show cause notice are met. The term &quot;or otherwise&quot; in Section 127B should be interpreted broadly, allowing the Settlement Commission to consider a wide range of cases, including those involving fraud or misdeclaration. The Court rejected the Madras HC&#039;s narrow interpretation, dismissing the government&#039;s petitions and allowing those filed by private parties, affirming the Commission&#039;s discretion to reject applications preliminarily.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2024 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 113 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47711</link>
      <description>The HC ruled that the Settlement Commission under Chapter XIV-A of the Customs Act has broad jurisdiction to entertain settlement applications, provided the conditions of filing a Bill of Entry or Shipping Bill and issuance of a show cause notice are met. The term &quot;or otherwise&quot; in Section 127B should be interpreted broadly, allowing the Settlement Commission to consider a wide range of cases, including those involving fraud or misdeclaration. The Court rejected the Madras HC&#039;s narrow interpretation, dismissing the government&#039;s petitions and allowing those filed by private parties, affirming the Commission&#039;s discretion to reject applications preliminarily.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>