https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=60622 The court criticised media practice of extracting innocuous judicial comments and presenting them as directed criticisms, stressing media responsibility to verify context and avoid sensationalisation or defamatory reporting. It declined to mandate deletions or apologies, expecting reputable outlets to self-regulate. Separately, it dismissed a plea to quash a non-bailable warrant issued for alleged evasion, and refused virtual-only participation where physical presence is mandatorily required, noting statutory safeguards remain available upon submission to jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 04 Nov 2025 19:31:04 +0530 Tue, 04 Nov 2025 19:31:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=60622 The court criticised media practice of extracting innocuous judicial comments and presenting them as directed criticisms, stressing media responsibility to verify context and avoid sensationalisation or defamatory reporting. It declined to mandate deletions or apologies, expecting reputable outlets to self-regulate. Separately, it dismissed a plea to quash a non-bailable warrant issued for alleged evasion, and refused virtual-only participation where physical presence is mandatorily required, noting statutory safeguards remain available upon submission to jurisdiction. News - Tue, 04 Nov 2025 19:31:04 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=60622