<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>What prejudice will be caused if bank provides hearing before classifying account as fraud: SC</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=60611</link>
    <description>Whether banks suffer prejudice by providing a personal/oral opportunity of hearing before classifying accounts as fraud was questioned; the court emphasised that lenders must furnish forensic audit conclusions, allow borrowers a reasonable opportunity to submit representations, and produce a reasoned order, while inviting banks to specify contingencies that would justify exemption from affording such hearings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 18:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 18:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>What prejudice will be caused if bank provides hearing before classifying account as fraud: SC</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=60611</link>
      <description>Whether banks suffer prejudice by providing a personal/oral opportunity of hearing before classifying accounts as fraud was questioned; the court emphasised that lenders must furnish forensic audit conclusions, allow borrowers a reasonable opportunity to submit representations, and produce a reasoned order, while inviting banks to specify contingencies that would justify exemption from affording such hearings.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 18:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=60611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>