<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 184 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47708</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that new grounds raised for the first time before the Tribunal - including absence of a registered project contract, application timing under Project Import Regulations, and inapplicability of Heading 98.01 - could not be entertained. Tribunal correctly refused to permit the Department to advance a new case on second appeal where those issues were not raised in the show cause notice, adjudicating authority, or first appellate proceedings. As none of the authorities had denied project-import benefit on those bases, the revenue was barred from expanding its case and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 184 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47708</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that new grounds raised for the first time before the Tribunal - including absence of a registered project contract, application timing under Project Import Regulations, and inapplicability of Heading 98.01 - could not be entertained. Tribunal correctly refused to permit the Department to advance a new case on second appeal where those issues were not raised in the show cause notice, adjudicating authority, or first appellate proceedings. As none of the authorities had denied project-import benefit on those bases, the revenue was barred from expanding its case and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>