https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47704 The court held that recovery of Customs and Central Excise duties from KSFC should be pursued through relevant statutes, not writ jurisdiction. It rejected the petitioners' plea for a Mandamus to direct KSFC to pay the dues. The judgment also discussed the Doctrine of Priority in government debt recovery, emphasizing that Constitutional provisions vary in different cases. It concluded that the Union of India can recover dues as per statutes without writ intervention. The court dismissed the Writ Appeal and Petitions, upholding the single Judge's decision and emphasizing the limitations of writ jurisdiction in such matters. en-us Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:41:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47704 The court held that recovery of Customs and Central Excise duties from KSFC should be pursued through relevant statutes, not writ jurisdiction. It rejected the petitioners' plea for a Mandamus to direct KSFC to pay the dues. The judgment also discussed the Doctrine of Priority in government debt recovery, emphasizing that Constitutional provisions vary in different cases. It concluded that the Union of India can recover dues as per statutes without writ intervention. The court dismissed the Writ Appeal and Petitions, upholding the single Judge's decision and emphasizing the limitations of writ jurisdiction in such matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47704