<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 160 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47696</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s denial of exemption under Notification No. 65/87-CE was left undisturbed, and the Supreme Court declined to interfere. The matter relating to small scale industry exemption and the consequential penalty was remanded for fresh determination, so the appeals failed and the lower order remained effective on the exemption issue pending reconsideration of the remanded questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 160 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47696</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s denial of exemption under Notification No. 65/87-CE was left undisturbed, and the Supreme Court declined to interfere. The matter relating to small scale industry exemption and the consequential penalty was remanded for fresh determination, so the appeals failed and the lower order remained effective on the exemption issue pending reconsideration of the remanded questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>