<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Final tax assessment cannot be reclassified as draft via corrigendum; assessment and demand quashed, procedural rights restored</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93864</link>
    <description>The HC held the issue not res integra and ruled that once the respondent-revenue issued a final assessment order followed immediately by a demand notice, it was impermissible to thereafter recharacterize that order as a draft by issuing a corrigendum; such conduct amounted to an improper circumvention of the finality of assessment. The court quashed the impugned assessment order, the accompanying demand notice and the subsequent corrigendum, restoring the petitioner&#039;s procedural rights and precluding the respondent-revenue from sustaining any second or substitute assessment predicated on the reclassification. The remedies granted were declaratory and restitutive, with the impugned instruments set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:03:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:03:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Final tax assessment cannot be reclassified as draft via corrigendum; assessment and demand quashed, procedural rights restored</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93864</link>
      <description>The HC held the issue not res integra and ruled that once the respondent-revenue issued a final assessment order followed immediately by a demand notice, it was impermissible to thereafter recharacterize that order as a draft by issuing a corrigendum; such conduct amounted to an improper circumvention of the finality of assessment. The court quashed the impugned assessment order, the accompanying demand notice and the subsequent corrigendum, restoring the petitioner&#039;s procedural rights and precluding the respondent-revenue from sustaining any second or substitute assessment predicated on the reclassification. The remedies granted were declaratory and restitutive, with the impugned instruments set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:03:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>