<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 118 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780650</link>
    <description>CESTAT, Mumbai (AT) held that trade discounts do not form part of the transaction value for Central Excise duty, following consistent orders by coordinate benches. Noting prior favorable orders for the appellants on earlier periods, the Tribunal found no basis for a different interpretation and set aside the impugned orders that had upheld the adjudged demands. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants and the confirmed duty demands by the department were annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:03:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 118 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780650</link>
      <description>CESTAT, Mumbai (AT) held that trade discounts do not form part of the transaction value for Central Excise duty, following consistent orders by coordinate benches. Noting prior favorable orders for the appellants on earlier periods, the Tribunal found no basis for a different interpretation and set aside the impugned orders that had upheld the adjudged demands. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants and the confirmed duty demands by the department were annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>