<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 119 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780651</link>
    <description>CESTAT KOLKATA - AT allowed CENVAT credit for all disputed input services claimed for 2007-08 to 31.03.2011 except Rent-a-Cab services, which are specifically excluded and must be reversed. The appellant must repay Rent-a-Cab credit and may owe interest only to the extent the CENVAT credit balance is insufficient; no penalty for Rent-a-Cab reversal due to lack of suppression. All other input services were held eligible under the &quot;means&quot; limb of Rule 2(l) and carry no interest or penalty. Appeal disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:03:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 119 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780651</link>
      <description>CESTAT KOLKATA - AT allowed CENVAT credit for all disputed input services claimed for 2007-08 to 31.03.2011 except Rent-a-Cab services, which are specifically excluded and must be reversed. The appellant must repay Rent-a-Cab credit and may owe interest only to the extent the CENVAT credit balance is insufficient; no penalty for Rent-a-Cab reversal due to lack of suppression. All other input services were held eligible under the &quot;means&quot; limb of Rule 2(l) and carry no interest or penalty. Appeal disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>