<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 120 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780652</link>
    <description>CESTAT KOL. allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Revenue appeal, holding that exemption under N. No. 06/2002 (as amended by N. 47/2002) applied to the pipes since the statutory certificate under Condition No. 47A established intended use in a water supply scheme. A demand under s.11D was held unsustainable because invoices showed no separate duty and s.11D did not apply to exempted goods for the relevant period. Consequently, all duty demands and penalties on the company and its officer were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:03:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 120 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780652</link>
      <description>CESTAT KOL. allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Revenue appeal, holding that exemption under N. No. 06/2002 (as amended by N. 47/2002) applied to the pipes since the statutory certificate under Condition No. 47A established intended use in a water supply scheme. A demand under s.11D was held unsustainable because invoices showed no separate duty and s.11D did not apply to exempted goods for the relevant period. Consequently, all duty demands and penalties on the company and its officer were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>