<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 179 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780711</link>
    <description>GST registration cancellation was stated to have been ordered for failure to furnish returns for the prescribed period. The petitioner expressed readiness to pay the outstanding tax, interest and any late fee, and both sides submitted that the matter was similarly placed to earlier Uttarakhand HC decisions dealing with the same cancellation issue. On that basis, the writ petition was disposed of in line with the approach adopted in those earlier matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:03:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 179 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780711</link>
      <description>GST registration cancellation was stated to have been ordered for failure to furnish returns for the prescribed period. The petitioner expressed readiness to pay the outstanding tax, interest and any late fee, and both sides submitted that the matter was similarly placed to earlier Uttarakhand HC decisions dealing with the same cancellation issue. On that basis, the writ petition was disposed of in line with the approach adopted in those earlier matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>