https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464507 Where a revision is already covered by an earlier decision and the opposing party does not dispute that applicability, the same legal conclusion is applied to the pending matter. The Allahabad HC note states that on this basis the revision was allowed, the substantial questions of law were answered in favour of the revisionist, and the impugned order was interfered with. The stated ratio is that an undisputed earlier binding decision governs the controversy and determines the result in the same manner. en-us Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Nov 2025 19:39:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464507 Where a revision is already covered by an earlier decision and the opposing party does not dispute that applicability, the same legal conclusion is applied to the pending matter. The Allahabad HC note states that on this basis the revision was allowed, the substantial questions of law were answered in favour of the revisionist, and the impugned order was interfered with. The stated ratio is that an undisputed earlier binding decision governs the controversy and determines the result in the same manner. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464507