<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1699 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464508</link>
    <description>SC considered whether registered dealers could claim unutilised input tax credit under the U.P. VAT Act after GST commenced on 1-7-2017 despite holding closing stock. The Court did not decide the substantive question but issued notice and listed the matter returnable in four weeks, leaving the entitlement unresolved pending further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 19:39:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1699 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464508</link>
      <description>SC considered whether registered dealers could claim unutilised input tax credit under the U.P. VAT Act after GST commenced on 1-7-2017 despite holding closing stock. The Court did not decide the substantive question but issued notice and listed the matter returnable in four weeks, leaving the entitlement unresolved pending further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>