https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47675 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, quashing the detention and seizure orders regarding machineries. It was found that the petitioners were not responsible for the violations of the Cenvat Credit Rules, which were attributed to respondent No. 4. The court determined that the actions of the authorities were unlawful and lacked factual basis, leading to the orders being set aside. The petitioners were awarded costs, emphasizing their innocence in the matter and the unjust nature of the detention and seizure. en-us Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:14:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47675 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, quashing the detention and seizure orders regarding machineries. It was found that the petitioners were not responsible for the violations of the Cenvat Credit Rules, which were attributed to respondent No. 4. The court determined that the actions of the authorities were unlawful and lacked factual basis, leading to the orders being set aside. The petitioners were awarded costs, emphasizing their innocence in the matter and the unjust nature of the detention and seizure. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47675