https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47671 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CEGAT order, citing the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act. Emphasizing the principle that statutory remedies in tax matters should be exhausted before resorting to writ jurisdiction, the court relied on legal precedents to support its decision. The court highlighted the importance of following the hierarchy of appeals provided by the statute and reiterated that writ jurisdiction should not be invoked when there is an alternative remedy available, particularly in tax proceedings. en-us Mon, 10 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:08:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47671 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CEGAT order, citing the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act. Emphasizing the principle that statutory remedies in tax matters should be exhausted before resorting to writ jurisdiction, the court relied on legal precedents to support its decision. The court highlighted the importance of following the hierarchy of appeals provided by the statute and reiterated that writ jurisdiction should not be invoked when there is an alternative remedy available, particularly in tax proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 10 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47671