https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47670 The appeal against the CESTAT's judgment was dismissed, affirming the suspension of the Customs House Agent's license without prior notice. The court held that immediate action was justified under Regulation 20(2) due to misconduct, and prior notice under Regulation 22(1) was not mandatory. The Respondent-Clearing Agency was not substantially implicated, and no costs were awarded. en-us Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Mar 2024 14:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47670 The appeal against the CESTAT's judgment was dismissed, affirming the suspension of the Customs House Agent's license without prior notice. The court held that immediate action was justified under Regulation 20(2) due to misconduct, and prior notice under Regulation 22(1) was not mandatory. The Respondent-Clearing Agency was not substantially implicated, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47670