https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780606 Undue delay in pronouncing an arbitral award is not, by itself, a statutory ground for setting aside the award; it matters only where the unexplained delay materially affects the findings or outcome, in which event the award may be vulnerable for public policy conflict or patent illegality under Section 34. An award that does not finally resolve the referred disputes, leaves the controversy open, and forces renewed litigation after altering the parties' positions is said to defeat arbitration and be liable to be set aside as patently illegal and contrary to public policy. Where restoration is impracticable and complete justice requires finality, Article 142 may be invoked. en-us Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:13:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780606 Undue delay in pronouncing an arbitral award is not, by itself, a statutory ground for setting aside the award; it matters only where the unexplained delay materially affects the findings or outcome, in which event the award may be vulnerable for public policy conflict or patent illegality under Section 34. An award that does not finally resolve the referred disputes, leaves the controversy open, and forces renewed litigation after altering the parties' positions is said to defeat arbitration and be liable to be set aside as patently illegal and contrary to public policy. Where restoration is impracticable and complete justice requires finality, Article 142 may be invoked. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780606