<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 76 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780608</link>
    <description>Laptops cleared in bulk to a Government undertaking for free distribution to students were held to remain assessable under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on retail sale price basis. The Tribunal treated the recipient as neither an institutional consumer nor an industrial consumer, applying the settled view that institutional consumer status is confined to purchases for service industry use. As the procurement was for free distribution and not for service industry or industrial consumption, the goods did not escape MRP-based valuation under Section 4A. The demand founded on non-application of Section 4A was rejected and the duty demand was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:13:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 76 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780608</link>
      <description>Laptops cleared in bulk to a Government undertaking for free distribution to students were held to remain assessable under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on retail sale price basis. The Tribunal treated the recipient as neither an institutional consumer nor an industrial consumer, applying the settled view that institutional consumer status is confined to purchases for service industry use. As the procurement was for free distribution and not for service industry or industrial consumption, the goods did not escape MRP-based valuation under Section 4A. The demand founded on non-application of Section 4A was rejected and the duty demand was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>