<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 76 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780608</link>
    <description>CESTAT CHENNAI - AT held that laptops cleared to a government undertaking for free distribution to students must be valued on Retail Sale Price (RSP) basis under Sections 4/4A of the CEA. The tribunal found the prior demand for differential duty unsustainable in light of this valuation approach and relevant precedent, set aside the impugned order imposing differential duty, and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:13:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 76 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780608</link>
      <description>CESTAT CHENNAI - AT held that laptops cleared to a government undertaking for free distribution to students must be valued on Retail Sale Price (RSP) basis under Sections 4/4A of the CEA. The tribunal found the prior demand for differential duty unsustainable in light of this valuation approach and relevant precedent, set aside the impugned order imposing differential duty, and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>