https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780609 A direct challenge to a CESTAT order was not maintainable because the appellant had an available statutory appeal to the High Court under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and did not pursue it. The appellant had earlier accepted that the statutory remedy lay before the High Court, and the Supreme Court rejected the direct challenge on that basis. en-us Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:13:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780609 A direct challenge to a CESTAT order was not maintainable because the appellant had an available statutory appeal to the High Court under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and did not pursue it. The appellant had earlier accepted that the statutory remedy lay before the High Court, and the Supreme Court rejected the direct challenge on that basis. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780609