https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780609 SC held the appeals were not maintainable because the appellants had not availed the statutory remedy of filing an appeal to the HC under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Since a statutory appeal to the HC was available and not pursued, the appellants could not directly challenge the CESTAT order in the SC. Appeals dismissed. en-us Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:13:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780609 SC held the appeals were not maintainable because the appellants had not availed the statutory remedy of filing an appeal to the HC under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Since a statutory appeal to the HC was available and not pursued, the appellants could not directly challenge the CESTAT order in the SC. Appeals dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780609