<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 78 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780610</link>
    <description>SC refused to condone a 248-day delay, finding no error in the impugned order or sufficient explanation to liberalize the delay. After reviewing the record, the Court held the appeal unsustainable and dismissed it both for want of prosecution delay and on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:13:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 78 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780610</link>
      <description>SC refused to condone a 248-day delay, finding no error in the impugned order or sufficient explanation to liberalize the delay. After reviewing the record, the Court held the appeal unsustainable and dismissed it both for want of prosecution delay and on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>