<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 84 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780616</link>
    <description>Under the Customs valuation regime, the dispute concerned whether enhancement of the declared transaction value of imported goods still required adjudication where it was stated that no further import of the balance quantity had taken place. The matter was not finally decided and was directed to be taken up again after instructions were obtained, so no substantive ruling on the valuation issue was recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 10:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 84 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780616</link>
      <description>Under the Customs valuation regime, the dispute concerned whether enhancement of the declared transaction value of imported goods still required adjudication where it was stated that no further import of the balance quantity had taken place. The matter was not finally decided and was directed to be taken up again after instructions were obtained, so no substantive ruling on the valuation issue was recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>