<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 89 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780621</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that an assessment framed u/s 143(3) by ITO Ward-3(4), Gurgaon was invalid because no mandatory notice u/s 143(2) was issued after jurisdictional transfer, although an earlier notice had been issued by a different ITO before transfer. Following precedent, the Tribunal set aside the assessment and the CIT(A)&#039;s confirmation, allowing the assessee&#039;s additional grounds and holding the impugned assessment unsustainable for want of the s143(2) notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 89 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780621</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that an assessment framed u/s 143(3) by ITO Ward-3(4), Gurgaon was invalid because no mandatory notice u/s 143(2) was issued after jurisdictional transfer, although an earlier notice had been issued by a different ITO before transfer. Following precedent, the Tribunal set aside the assessment and the CIT(A)&#039;s confirmation, allowing the assessee&#039;s additional grounds and holding the impugned assessment unsustainable for want of the s143(2) notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>