<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 96 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780628</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice issued in the name of an amalgamated company that had already ceased to exist is invalid because a notice to a non-existent entity is vitiated from the outset. Where the assessee had informed the tax authorities of the amalgamation and the successor entity had assumed the former company&#039;s identity, the notice could not be sustained in the amalgamated name. Later case law relied on by the Revenue did not cure this foundational defect. The first appellate authority&#039;s finding was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 96 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780628</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice issued in the name of an amalgamated company that had already ceased to exist is invalid because a notice to a non-existent entity is vitiated from the outset. Where the assessee had informed the tax authorities of the amalgamation and the successor entity had assumed the former company&#039;s identity, the notice could not be sustained in the amalgamated name. Later case law relied on by the Revenue did not cure this foundational defect. The first appellate authority&#039;s finding was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>