<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47662</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner to file an application for condonation of delay by a specified date. Upon filing, the Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to first deal with the application, condone the delay, and then proceed with hearing the appeal on its merits. The impugned order of dismissal was quashed, restoring the appeal to the file and allowing the petition. The petitioner was ordered to bear the costs payable to the respondent revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:41:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47662</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner to file an application for condonation of delay by a specified date. Upon filing, the Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to first deal with the application, condone the delay, and then proceed with hearing the appeal on its merits. The impugned order of dismissal was quashed, restoring the appeal to the file and allowing the petition. The petitioner was ordered to bear the costs payable to the respondent revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>