https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780646 HC held the petitioner entitled to interest for delay caused by the Department's failure to issue a deficiency memo within the statutory timelines, while noting the petitioner's own 74-day delay in responding to that memo. The Court emphasized the adverse commercial impact of departmental delay and directed the respondent to decide the IGST refund applications expeditiously, dealing with the claims in accordance with the statutory scheme and timelines. en-us Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:13:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780646 HC held the petitioner entitled to interest for delay caused by the Department's failure to issue a deficiency memo within the statutory timelines, while noting the petitioner's own 74-day delay in responding to that memo. The Court emphasized the adverse commercial impact of departmental delay and directed the respondent to decide the IGST refund applications expeditiously, dealing with the claims in accordance with the statutory scheme and timelines. Case-Laws GST Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780646