https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47660 The court declined to entertain the petitioner's claim for compensation for pilfered goods in the writ jurisdiction, stating that such claims should be pursued through civil or arbitration proceedings due to factual disputes. The unamended petition was already addressed, and no additional relief was granted, leaving other avenues open for the petitioner to seek compensation. en-us Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:37:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47660 The court declined to entertain the petitioner's claim for compensation for pilfered goods in the writ jurisdiction, stating that such claims should be pursued through civil or arbitration proceedings due to factual disputes. The unamended petition was already addressed, and no additional relief was granted, leaving other avenues open for the petitioner to seek compensation. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47660