<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 94 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47646</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court vacated interim orders issued by the High Court regarding the communication and publication of final findings by the Designated Authority in proceedings for imposing anti-dumping duty. It stressed the importance of timely completion of the process and allowed the Designated Authority to submit final findings to the Central Government for decision-making. The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s power to grant interim relief during proceedings, highlighted the appealable nature of the decision on anti-dumping duty, and refrained from expressing an opinion on territorial jurisdiction. The appeals were allowed without any costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 94 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47646</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court vacated interim orders issued by the High Court regarding the communication and publication of final findings by the Designated Authority in proceedings for imposing anti-dumping duty. It stressed the importance of timely completion of the process and allowed the Designated Authority to submit final findings to the Central Government for decision-making. The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s power to grant interim relief during proceedings, highlighted the appealable nature of the decision on anti-dumping duty, and refrained from expressing an opinion on territorial jurisdiction. The appeals were allowed without any costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>