<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer wins: lease rentals to development authority not liable to TDS under section 194-I before prospective ruling</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93785</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the taxpayer&#039;s appeal, holding that payments of lease rentals made to the statutory development authority during the relevant fiscal year were not subject to deduction of tax at source under section 194-I prior to the date on which higher courts declared the provision to apply prospectively. The Tribunal found that the assessing authorities erred in treating the taxpayer as an &quot;assessee in default&quot; and in issuing orders under sections 201(1)/201(1A). Pursuant to the appellate and superior court pronouncements giving prospective effect to TDS applicability, the orders of the lower authorities and the CIT(A) were set aside and the taxpayer&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer wins: lease rentals to development authority not liable to TDS under section 194-I before prospective ruling</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93785</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the taxpayer&#039;s appeal, holding that payments of lease rentals made to the statutory development authority during the relevant fiscal year were not subject to deduction of tax at source under section 194-I prior to the date on which higher courts declared the provision to apply prospectively. The Tribunal found that the assessing authorities erred in treating the taxpayer as an &quot;assessee in default&quot; and in issuing orders under sections 201(1)/201(1A). Pursuant to the appellate and superior court pronouncements giving prospective effect to TDS applicability, the orders of the lower authorities and the CIT(A) were set aside and the taxpayer&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>