<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 158 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47644</link>
    <description>The appellant was permitted to continue agitating the issue that had earlier been remitted and pursued after the tribunal&#039;s remand proceedings. The matter was disposed of with observations that the appellant could raise the issue before the Commissioner, and if necessary before the tribunal and thereafter the Court, preserving the appellant&#039;s ability to seek further consideration on the remitted question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 158 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47644</link>
      <description>The appellant was permitted to continue agitating the issue that had earlier been remitted and pursued after the tribunal&#039;s remand proceedings. The matter was disposed of with observations that the appellant could raise the issue before the Commissioner, and if necessary before the tribunal and thereafter the Court, preserving the appellant&#039;s ability to seek further consideration on the remitted question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>