<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 10 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780542</link>
    <description>Non-supply of the relied upon documents, including the material forming the recorded reasons to believe, violated the mandatory disclosure requirement under the PMLA and denied fair notice to the appellant. The Tribunal held that the statutory scheme and governing precedent required service of all foundational materials with the show-cause notice and during adjudication; since the notice was not accompanied by those documents and some core materials, including FIRs used to initiate action, were never furnished, the defect was fatal. The freezing and seizure directions were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 10 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780542</link>
      <description>Non-supply of the relied upon documents, including the material forming the recorded reasons to believe, violated the mandatory disclosure requirement under the PMLA and denied fair notice to the appellant. The Tribunal held that the statutory scheme and governing precedent required service of all foundational materials with the show-cause notice and during adjudication; since the notice was not accompanied by those documents and some core materials, including FIRs used to initiate action, were never furnished, the defect was fatal. The freezing and seizure directions were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>