https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780545 NCLAT allowed the company appeal, quashed the impugned NCLT order and remitted the petition to the Ld. NCLT Hyderabad Bench for de novo consideration on the merits based on the record. The court found a violation of natural justice because the appellant was not accorded an effective opportunity of hearing under Sections 241, 242, 213 and 119 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rules 11, 23 and 43 of the NCLT Rules, 2016; the respondents accepted that deficiency, and the matter must be re-decided accordingly. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780545 NCLAT allowed the company appeal, quashed the impugned NCLT order and remitted the petition to the Ld. NCLT Hyderabad Bench for de novo consideration on the merits based on the record. The court found a violation of natural justice because the appellant was not accorded an effective opportunity of hearing under Sections 241, 242, 213 and 119 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rules 11, 23 and 43 of the NCLT Rules, 2016; the respondents accepted that deficiency, and the matter must be re-decided accordingly. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780545