<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 44 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780576</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that TDS under s.194I was not required to be deducted on lease rentals paid to a statutory development authority prior to 16/02/2017, following the HC decision given prospective effect as affirmed by the SC. Payments made in FY 2011-12 (AY 2012-13) therefore did not attract liability as an &quot;assessee in default.&quot; Orders passed u/s 201(1)/201(1A) and the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision were set aside and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 44 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780576</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that TDS under s.194I was not required to be deducted on lease rentals paid to a statutory development authority prior to 16/02/2017, following the HC decision given prospective effect as affirmed by the SC. Payments made in FY 2011-12 (AY 2012-13) therefore did not attract liability as an &quot;assessee in default.&quot; Orders passed u/s 201(1)/201(1A) and the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision were set aside and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>