<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 62 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780594</link>
    <description>HC found that the adjudication breached principles of natural justice by denying a personal hearing and issuing a non-speaking, mechanical order. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted to the competent authority to proceed afresh from the stage of the notice, affording an opportunity of hearing and ensuring compliance with statutory scheme. Petition disposed of by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 62 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780594</link>
      <description>HC found that the adjudication breached principles of natural justice by denying a personal hearing and issuing a non-speaking, mechanical order. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted to the competent authority to proceed afresh from the stage of the notice, affording an opportunity of hearing and ensuring compliance with statutory scheme. Petition disposed of by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>