<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 68 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780600</link>
    <description>An ex parte GST adjudication confirming demand was set aside because the taxpayer had not filed a reply to the show-cause notice for a plausible, bona fide reason, namely that the notice had not been noticed on the GST portal. The court adopted a justice-oriented approach and held that refusing an opportunity to respond would prejudice the taxpayer. The proceedings were remitted for fresh adjudication from the stage of filing the reply, so the taxpayer could contest the matter on merits and be heard before final determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 68 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780600</link>
      <description>An ex parte GST adjudication confirming demand was set aside because the taxpayer had not filed a reply to the show-cause notice for a plausible, bona fide reason, namely that the notice had not been noticed on the GST portal. The court adopted a justice-oriented approach and held that refusing an opportunity to respond would prejudice the taxpayer. The proceedings were remitted for fresh adjudication from the stage of filing the reply, so the taxpayer could contest the matter on merits and be heard before final determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>