https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780601 HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned adjudication order and remitted the matter to the 2nd respondent for fresh adjudication in accordance with law. The court noted the petitioner did not receive audit notices and could not file replies, and although the revenue relied on notifications extending limitation, the HC directed that one more opportunity be afforded to the petitioner. The matter was remanded to avoid multiplicity and conflicting orders, with directions to reconsider afresh. en-us Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780601 HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned adjudication order and remitted the matter to the 2nd respondent for fresh adjudication in accordance with law. The court noted the petitioner did not receive audit notices and could not file replies, and although the revenue relied on notifications extending limitation, the HC directed that one more opportunity be afforded to the petitioner. The matter was remanded to avoid multiplicity and conflicting orders, with directions to reconsider afresh. Case-Laws GST Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780601