<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780603</link>
    <description>SC issued notice returnable in four weeks in petitions challenging GST assessment orders under joint development agreements, noting the High Court observed petitioners alleged lack of alternative remedy without explaining bypass of ordinary remedy process and made a false claim of no effective remedy. Meanwhile SC stayed operation of the Assistant Commissioner, CGST &amp; Central Excise, Nashik-I Division&#039;s assessment orders pending return of notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780603</link>
      <description>SC issued notice returnable in four weeks in petitions challenging GST assessment orders under joint development agreements, noting the High Court observed petitioners alleged lack of alternative remedy without explaining bypass of ordinary remedy process and made a false claim of no effective remedy. Meanwhile SC stayed operation of the Assistant Commissioner, CGST &amp; Central Excise, Nashik-I Division&#039;s assessment orders pending return of notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>