<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1507 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464473</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on processed inputs or intermediate products cleared by a job worker was examined under the erstwhile Rule 57F(2) and Rule 57F(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, along with whether the prescribed procedure had to be followed in full and whether an assessee adopting that procedure could depart from it. The appeal was admitted and substantial questions of law were framed, but there was no final adjudication on the merits of these issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 19:09:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1507 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464473</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on processed inputs or intermediate products cleared by a job worker was examined under the erstwhile Rule 57F(2) and Rule 57F(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, along with whether the prescribed procedure had to be followed in full and whether an assessee adopting that procedure could depart from it. The appeal was admitted and substantial questions of law were framed, but there was no final adjudication on the merits of these issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>