https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47622 The HC quashed CESTAT's order dated 6-12-2005 and the reference made on 12-8-2005, citing non-compliance with Section 129C(5) of the Customs Act, 1961. The Division Bench was directed to formulate specific points of difference and refer them to the President. The petition was allowed, with the rule made absolute, and no costs were ordered. en-us Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47622 The HC quashed CESTAT's order dated 6-12-2005 and the reference made on 12-8-2005, citing non-compliance with Section 129C(5) of the Customs Act, 1961. The Division Bench was directed to formulate specific points of difference and refer them to the President. The petition was allowed, with the rule made absolute, and no costs were ordered. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47622